Military Governments Essay -- essays research papers

Military GovernmentsMilitary governments name been more than or less since the days of feudalism. Itis the oldest and most common political farming. According to Shively, a multitudegovernment is one in which a group of officers use their force to take over thegovernmental apparatus and unravel it themselves. Military governments ar usuallyweak in appeasing the masses for they are cognize to be brutal and power hungryand are also preferably fragile, both internally and externally.In its primitive state, existing as feudalism, the high rankingofficials/nobility and the legions itself was composed solely of the elite vox populi class. But as society became more complex, the role of the elite was meagrely altered as technology progressed and the nobility and kings no longercontrolled weapons nor could rule out the disintegration of the feudal society.Modern military governments usually occur after the military sets acoup. A coup is the forceful deposition of a governmen t by all or a portion ofthe arm forces and installation of a new military government. Coupsordinarily take prat when the present government poses a threat to the state orthe condition quo. Because the military controls more armed power than anyone in astate, they have the ability to take over the government at any prone time. InPower and Choice, Shively questions the notion of the infrequency of militarygovernments. Yes, they are common, just why arent they more common? The reasonbeing that as societies kick upstairs and become more complex, it is necessary for theruling elite to be more knowledgeable of the processes by which a government isoperated. This explains the recurrence of civilian-run governments. Themilitary may have a few leaders who are skilled politically, nevertheless the armedforces are not customarily trained to run governments. recollect that the role ofthe military is to protect and serve the state, therefore there is usually acycle, known as the Barracks cycle, in which the military brings about a coup,but later reestablishes civilian control, and is the new state threatensgovernmental stability, the military stages yet another coup, etc. The longerthe military stays in power, the more the political state exists unstably.In Nigeria, for ... ... form of government or pullulate to a new sophisticatedgovernment.In any case, military governments are weak internally and externally.They pose as forms of transitional governments, not necessarily in times ofrevolution, but in times when the state itself becomes weak or poses a threat tothe status quo. Though some(prenominal) military governments do perservere for years andyears without being overthrown, their inability to run the state efficientlyforces the military to restore democracy or to stage another overthrow of thegovernment. Also, because the military government itself takes power through noregular process as other, more stable forms of government, but just seizes it,they enco unter the problem of legitimacy. Lastly, coalitions internally are initself a firm other government. The weakness and competition present betweenthese coalitions usually causes the spill of the military government andinstallment of a new civilian-run government resolved so by the general consensus.Generally, all military governments will pass away in time and return to it previousgovernment or evolve to a whole new governmental system with a revolution.