Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Legal Aspects Of Business Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Legal Aspects Of line of merchandise - Case Study ExampleHe should always comply with the deadline. Failure to do so makes every his efforts fruitless. So though he delivered the product it was of no value to the node as he had overstep out of time and had made other arrangements.In the bailiwick provided its non mentioned that the contract between Alf and the client was scripted or not. If the contract is written then legal reach can be interpreted against Alf. Since verbally the client has mentioned that he cannot reach other than the stipulated time, he has all rights to take action against Alf. The written agreement between both the parties with a clear mention of the time makes Alfs case weaker. However if the customer does not draw a copy of the written agreement between him and Alf then his case becomes weaker. excessively if somewhere in the contract if its mentioned that the shopkeeper is in no way responsible for any delays in delivery then too, the customer can n ot take any action against Alf. So though verbally Alf and the customer know about their agreement, if the customer has a written document then Alfs action can be proved a legal offence. So for the sake of law it is advisable that Alf does not impose the contract forcefully on the customer.In the second case the customer was unable to work with an ... After inspecting the gravity of the defect, the seller should replace the product, repair the fault or in extreme spate even refund the money if the customer is not ready for either replacement or repair. unless he cannot say no to the customer. Hence legally the customer can take action against Alf for not complying with the guidelines of marketing electronic gadgets. In such circumstances it is advisable for Alf to refund, as he himself will not have to suffer any losses because the sellers have back-to-back service and maintenance contract with manufacturers. According to Kolah if the customer claims that the purchased product is not working properly then Such a claim will dominate the interpretation of the suspects obligations under the terms of the contract. This is because there may be express terms of an agreement the claimant and defendant concerning the purpose and standard of the product. (2002, p. 52) If its not this, then to ensure that the product is fit for the purpose made cognise to the seller, in the contract terms, the law implies that the product is of good quality and is appropriate for the buyer. In the third case too, Alf has the similar legal bindings as in the second case. Alf assured the customer at the time of sale that the saw he is selling is meant to cut anything, even steel bars. Since the saw broke down on the first day of its use, the case of misrepresentation of facts by the seller can be charged on Alf. He is liable for refund or replacement and if he is not willing to do so then the customer has all rights to drag him to court. If the seller is making a statement to the po tential buyer, alike(p) in this case, according to Kolah

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.